Also agree that we should invite new members. There will be many impacts on early career scientists. Would be great to continue to foster career development through elections into MDRS.
In relation to the Cermak award, would it be best to award it this year but invite the winners to the 2021 meeting so they still benefit from attending an “in person” meeting?
Sure. Why not? I am very agreeable this morning. If we also nominate new people for 2021, that means 4 Cermak/Corkin speakers, and fewer slots for others.
MDRS Manchester
sounds good
LikeLike
I think we should
LikeLike
Yes, that is a great idea
LikeLike
I’m in favor of inviting new nominees
LikeLike
Yes!
LikeLike
Sure, why not.
LikeLike
Yes, definitely!
LikeLike
Also agree that we should invite new members. There will be many impacts on early career scientists. Would be great to continue to foster career development through elections into MDRS.
LikeLike
In relation to the Cermak award, would it be best to award it this year but invite the winners to the 2021 meeting so they still benefit from attending an “in person” meeting?
LikeLike
I agree with adding new members, and I also support Aidan’s idea if the funding allows it!
LikeLike
Sure. Why not? I am very agreeable this morning. If we also nominate new people for 2021, that means 4 Cermak/Corkin speakers, and fewer slots for others.
LikeLike
Yes!
LikeLike
Yes
LikeLike
Yes, we should add new members. The Travel Award program requires some adjustment. Perhaps just have one set next year.
LikeLike